This reporting pulls back the curtain on something that’s been treated as shadowy for years: an anonymous blacklist that can shape real people’s lives is not some decentralized “grassroots” effort—it’s structured, funded, and staffed by identifiable actors with clear institutional ties. That matters.
What’s especially troubling isn’t just who is allegedly behind Canary Mission, but how its output appears to have been operationalized by the U.S. government. If anonymous dossiers compiled by politically motivated actors are feeding into detention or deportation decisions, that’s not just controversial—it raises serious constitutional questions about due process and free speech.
At minimum, this demands transparency and accountability. If the government is relying on material from a foreign-linked, non-transparent organization to make enforcement decisions, the public deserves to know the extent of that relationship—and where the line is drawn between advocacy and state power.
Thank you for your great reporting. It should be clear to anyone who is following the news that agents of Israel like AIPAC and Canary Mission have a pathological influence over US politics. These agents are a threat to human rights and to US democracy. Their influence should be curtailed as quickly as possible. Personally, I would never knowingly vote for any politician who receives money from AIPAC.
Thank you again for your investigations and well documented reporting. So many students and professors had their lives turned upside down bc of these lists
Great article, thanks.
Photos of these people would be great, just so they're publicly known, as they do with others, their faces should be known, thanks.
This reporting pulls back the curtain on something that’s been treated as shadowy for years: an anonymous blacklist that can shape real people’s lives is not some decentralized “grassroots” effort—it’s structured, funded, and staffed by identifiable actors with clear institutional ties. That matters.
What’s especially troubling isn’t just who is allegedly behind Canary Mission, but how its output appears to have been operationalized by the U.S. government. If anonymous dossiers compiled by politically motivated actors are feeding into detention or deportation decisions, that’s not just controversial—it raises serious constitutional questions about due process and free speech.
At minimum, this demands transparency and accountability. If the government is relying on material from a foreign-linked, non-transparent organization to make enforcement decisions, the public deserves to know the extent of that relationship—and where the line is drawn between advocacy and state power.
Thank you for your great reporting. It should be clear to anyone who is following the news that agents of Israel like AIPAC and Canary Mission have a pathological influence over US politics. These agents are a threat to human rights and to US democracy. Their influence should be curtailed as quickly as possible. Personally, I would never knowingly vote for any politician who receives money from AIPAC.
I won’t vote for anyone who takes money from AIPAC or any Israeli-associated group. I rely heavily on @TrackAIPAC for information.
Thanks for another great report.
Thanks for all your valuable work!
Amazing work, thank you!
Thank you again for your investigations and well documented reporting. So many students and professors had their lives turned upside down bc of these lists
Great reporting. Thanks for your work.
Correction: you said that Efrat is in Israel. It's not; it's in the West Banki.
Wexner again. All those bras, panties and toiletry products profits a backbone of the Zionist cabal.