8 Comments
User's avatar
Huckleberry Palmer's avatar

Compare Iranian 3.67% enrichment to the 19.75% enrichment for small nuclear reactors (SMRs) being pushed as an energy solution for US data centers to support AI of you want to know how serious the US is about preventing proliferation . . .

ESTEE CHANDLER's avatar

Might Trump see waging war on Iran as a way to get his approval ratings up?

Ola's avatar

Ridiculous how Netanyahu says he cares about Lebanon and Syria and Iran! So Ridiculous ! It's outrageous!

Rosalie's avatar

Thank you for your reporting!

No surprise on the outcome with the Iran/US negotiations. Same with US/Hamas negotiations. Steve Witkoff representing the U.S. in both those negotiations just proved that the U.S. was not negotiating in good faith; and, again proved the U.S. can’t be trusted. Witkoff negotiating on behalf of the US or Israel? Again, Hamas released POW Edan Alexander and what did they get in return? Israel continued to bomb Palestinians.

Tom Schwoegler's avatar

Curious to know what value doing a deal with Iran would have been if someone whispered in his ear: "You OK this, no Nobel Peace Price.

Huckleberry Palmer's avatar

The advice to Iran to not attack US targets sounds a bit like foreshadowing a future rationale for US attacking Iran for any hit on a US target, no matter how minor or collateral.

Huckleberry Palmer's avatar

Strikes on Lebanon were Israel practicing how to cut off the head, crippling a potential response. Iran can choose between capitulation to no enrichment, or to rebuild from damage and sprint toward nuclear weapon. How successful was Israel in crippling Iran's ability to retaliate with missiles? Will Iran chose that response, or forgo that and choose between capitulation or pursuit of a nuclear weapon? If they don't massively respond, it might take away one way in which America rushes into direct regional involvement.

ESTEE CHANDLER's avatar

Israel needs a boogie-man more than ever as it's own approval ratings plummet