There’s a misunderstanding here. We should *neither* be couping any governments *nor* importing their populations by the millions. Neither of those policies are good ideas, but both are advocated for by corrupt special interests in Washington.
Not the literal constitutional amendment, of course. But you will find many examples of politicians who support both foreign interventions, and mass migration for people fleeing those interventions. For example:
Nice to know there's always someone who will stand up for imperialism.
There’s a misunderstanding here. We should *neither* be couping any governments *nor* importing their populations by the millions. Neither of those policies are good ideas, but both are advocated for by corrupt special interests in Washington.
Literally no one on Capital Hill is advocating what I have proposed.
I would like the number of your weed dealer - it must be some good stuff!
Not the literal constitutional amendment, of course. But you will find many examples of politicians who support both foreign interventions, and mass migration for people fleeing those interventions. For example:
- https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/sep/08/lindsey-graham-republican-syrian-refugees
- https://www.npr.org/2024/05/08/1249886160/biden-considers-allowing-some-palestinians-from-gaza-to-come-to-the-u-s-as-refug