15 Comments
User's avatar
George Leone's avatar

The U.S. bombing Iran while claiming Iran is “refusing diplomacy” is the same cynical playbook used in Iraq, Libya, and countless other wars—destroy first, then blame the victim for not negotiating under fire. Demanding “unconditional surrender” while civilians and children are being killed exposes this war for what it is: not defense, but imperial coercion. History will remember who sabotaged diplomacy and chose escalation instead.

Eleanor Ommani's avatar

Your Reporting is Critical to the growing anti-war, anti-imperialist movement here in the U.S. ‘Belly of the Beast’‼️👏🏼💞🌈🌹❤️‍🔥☮️☮️🇮🇷☮️🇮🇷☮️🇮🇷

Stephen Lyons's avatar

Twice the U.S. has attacked Iran while in negotiations with Iran. The U.S. realy know how to burn their bridges behind them.

Claridge's avatar

Very valuable reporting and insight -- needed perspective. Thank you. The dissembling, lying and hysterics coming from the White House and the Pentagon makes clear that this thing is out of control already. Bibi and Trump are not working towards the same goals or end state. This is apparent to all, clearly being exploited by the Iranian government, and as you say, seen by neighbors in the region and in Europe. Things will get much worse if the US does not exit stage left soon, seems to me.

Karen Ashikeh LaMantia's avatar

If you have been listening to or reading about war with Iran, much of it written by Mr. Scahill, for the past decade or even talked with someone who knows this area of the world, you would know what is described here is accurate. It is not unexpected unless in the mind of the guy who "thought about it" all weeek at his golf resort. D. Trump and those who wished for their own version of reality, his advisors, should not be surprised. Who did know this stuff were the military leaders, including the (recently) former head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who just said " NO. "Not a good or workable idea, Mr. President." They knew, as they should know, with undoubtable intelligence about this part of the world and its prep for wars. Too bad we relied on the Resident's "thinking" to decide on war and the delusional advice that supported it. Can anything stop it? Yes, cut off funding by Congress ( it worked for Vietnam) or Military personnel can just say NO. In the field and at sea, they do not need to be engaged to help bring on Armagedon, as told to some troops now engaged in combat. They probably did not sign up for that.

Jon Notabot's avatar

Excellent coverage

Istvan Kash's avatar

I could not wrap my head around Mideast countries or European leaders not voicing resistance to the US Israeli genocide the past years. Pedro Sanchez of Spain being the moral outlier of the EU. So now the enablers are beginning to pay a price for that failure. And what is their response? To circle the wagons and criticize Iran for defending itself against an uncalled for aggression against it. Maybe they’ll pickup that wake up call when they are affected.

Manny5's avatar
6hEdited

Does Trump thinks he defeated Iran and now he can choose the next Supreme Leader? This guy is seriously deranged. He must be interned in an mental Institution.

Mehrdad's avatar

The negotiation should involve ending the Zionist regime

Paul Bourdon's avatar

UN must be on vacation? They should just disband it. A total useless waste of money.

Ocassionally Sharpe's avatar

Great reporting. Thank you.

Clayton  Johnson's avatar

To the reporters at Drop Site,

Thank you for your work. I would like to propose a massive project for this organization to undertake. This news site has done an excellent job of reporting on the facts on the ground and what the reality of the situation actually is. Would you guys be able to create a sort of LinkedIn page to the people who actually make the decisions? Just like J mail did with Epstein, would you be able to create a LinkedIn page or a spider map with biographies of all the powerful people in the Israeli government and how they influence decisions in Israel and around the world. I know many of your reporters are based in the Middle East and the fact that Israel is such a small country and the political figures often rotate across government positions. Would a spider web map with biographies be able to be created of all the powerful people in this government and would you be able to map out this social circle? See who is connected to finance, who creates the strategy and writes the policy. A great example would be like the founding of the Federalist Society which shaped republican policy for decades first through the courts, and then transitioning down to economic and then social policy. A great example is Robert Bork's book called the Antitrust Paradox, which was widely adopted and executed into action finally bleeding into the social fabric of the country. If this site wants to impact social policy and spread this sort of Enlightenment ideals, we need a flow chart of where the policy decisions come from and trace the organizational structure of how these decisions get adopted into policy through finance, law and military actions. Obviously, we do not have access to peoples emails like with what has been released in the E files, but a flow map of who the influential people who make decisions in Israel would be a great start so when these guys pop up we can see a sort of LinkedIn biography of what they area bout and the social circles they involve themselves with. Doing this in the United States would be great, but lets start with Israel because it is a much smaller government and much less people involved.

Jazzme's avatar

Nothing new here Jeremy but things for redistributing what's already out there so your readers get the scoop. So thanks for that.

Peace

Ayub Midea's avatar

Great breakdown and reporting. My view is that Iran’s government cannot afford to appear weak in front of its own people. Their leader was assassinated and many civilians, including children, were killed. Under those circumstances, negotiating immediately with those responsible would likely be seen domestically as weakness.

At the same time, Iran’s ability to strike significant targets despite years of sanctions shows they are trying to demonstrate they still have the capacity to respond. If this conflict escalates into ground war, urban warfare would be devastating and civilians would suffer the most as infrastructure and basic services collapse.

It’s also hard to imagine regional and global powers staying idle if foreign troops enter Iran. In short, Iran may be signaling that it is not negotiating from a position of weakness.

Ocassionally Sharpe's avatar

The great catastrophe for Iranians is that the regime will not fall and this despicable act fomented by the Israelis will give the mullahs another two generations in power