I heard this line of thinking constantly during the election, and was consistently talked down to which prevented having a dialogue about it. We were told how we had to vote, but our concerns were never assuaged and thus our votes were never earned. A party that parades around the notion of "democracy" while ignoring voters and shutting …
I heard this line of thinking constantly during the election, and was consistently talked down to which prevented having a dialogue about it. We were told how we had to vote, but our concerns were never assuaged and thus our votes were never earned. A party that parades around the notion of "democracy" while ignoring voters and shutting out people we disagreed with was a bad look.
Biden and Harris needed to signal that there was merit to that campaign strategy. Incumbents already have executive power. But the last year showed us there was no credibility in their words.
If a party is unwilling to respond to feedback, then intentionally getting blamed is a way for a voting bloc to show that they have enough power to be taken seriously.
I heard this line of thinking constantly during the election, and was consistently talked down to which prevented having a dialogue about it. We were told how we had to vote, but our concerns were never assuaged and thus our votes were never earned. A party that parades around the notion of "democracy" while ignoring voters and shutting out people we disagreed with was a bad look.
Biden and Harris needed to signal that there was merit to that campaign strategy. Incumbents already have executive power. But the last year showed us there was no credibility in their words.
If a party is unwilling to respond to feedback, then intentionally getting blamed is a way for a voting bloc to show that they have enough power to be taken seriously.