I agree with Lisa and I'm quite disappointed with Dropsite news appearing to follow the herd of media outlets providing such low-quality reporting that honestly feels tabloid-esque.
Given the suspicious timing and context of the accusations against Khan and the lack of any evidence for the accusations (just hearsay) there was no compellin…
I agree with Lisa and I'm quite disappointed with Dropsite news appearing to follow the herd of media outlets providing such low-quality reporting that honestly feels tabloid-esque.
Given the suspicious timing and context of the accusations against Khan and the lack of any evidence for the accusations (just hearsay) there was no compelling need to re-hash what all the other F-rate media outlets are saying.
We expect - and paid - for an independent media outlet that would do justice to the issues at hand. If the investigation against Khan has any meat to it then that would be worth reporting - but a complaint, a random person named "Lynch", whose name is peppered throughout the article without clear reference to his role in the ICC? No investigative work on intimidation tactics used against the accusers, against the possible victim of false accusation, no discussion of the undermining of the ICC by major powers worldwide and the context of these accusations?? This piece was SO low quality and if this continues I'm not renewing my subscription. I suspect many here share that sentiment.
I agree with Lisa and I'm quite disappointed with Dropsite news appearing to follow the herd of media outlets providing such low-quality reporting that honestly feels tabloid-esque.
Given the suspicious timing and context of the accusations against Khan and the lack of any evidence for the accusations (just hearsay) there was no compelling need to re-hash what all the other F-rate media outlets are saying.
We expect - and paid - for an independent media outlet that would do justice to the issues at hand. If the investigation against Khan has any meat to it then that would be worth reporting - but a complaint, a random person named "Lynch", whose name is peppered throughout the article without clear reference to his role in the ICC? No investigative work on intimidation tactics used against the accusers, against the possible victim of false accusation, no discussion of the undermining of the ICC by major powers worldwide and the context of these accusations?? This piece was SO low quality and if this continues I'm not renewing my subscription. I suspect many here share that sentiment.