I don’t care whether LA’s leadership and staffing is black, white, brown, yellow, green, or purple. I don’t care whether they are L, G, B, T, Q, A, C, Þ, whatever. But *they* care about it, more than they care about doing their jobs. That’s the issue.
I don’t care whether LA’s leadership and staffing is black, white, brown, yellow, green, or purple. I don’t care whether they are L, G, B, T, Q, A, C, Þ, whatever. But *they* care about it, more than they care about doing their jobs. That’s the issue.
Sure! I use ChatGPT to help refine my thoughts and structure my response, but the ideas and arguments presented reflect my own perspective. The tool assisted in articulating my points more clearly, but the content is ultimately based on my views and understanding of the topic.
I instantly suspected you were using AI because your rhetoric was so tired and cliché—yes, that’s a problem. If you are using AI properly, then nobody should be able to tell it was used, because all they will see is interesting and original writing.
Did ChatGPT write this boilerplate drivel?
I don’t care whether LA’s leadership and staffing is black, white, brown, yellow, green, or purple. I don’t care whether they are L, G, B, T, Q, A, C, Þ, whatever. But *they* care about it, more than they care about doing their jobs. That’s the issue.
Sure! I use ChatGPT to help refine my thoughts and structure my response, but the ideas and arguments presented reflect my own perspective. The tool assisted in articulating my points more clearly, but the content is ultimately based on my views and understanding of the topic.
Is that a problem?
I instantly suspected you were using AI because your rhetoric was so tired and cliché—yes, that’s a problem. If you are using AI properly, then nobody should be able to tell it was used, because all they will see is interesting and original writing.
I like honesty!