Pat, I am waiting to hear of the SC deciding that, seeing no way that they cannot so decide, but if money can be called speech, the Court can make the impossible possible.
The state anti-BDS laws are in two groups. One group prohibits state pension funds from investing in any organization that supports BDS and the other group prohibits state contracts from going to anyone who will not sign a statement of opposition to BDS and renounce participation in BDS. Both groups are denying freedom of speech but the latter is openly sanctioning freedom of speech and is outrageously unconstitutional.
I thought SCOTUS had declared these unconstitutional.
Pat, I am waiting to hear of the SC deciding that, seeing no way that they cannot so decide, but if money can be called speech, the Court can make the impossible possible.
The state anti-BDS laws are in two groups. One group prohibits state pension funds from investing in any organization that supports BDS and the other group prohibits state contracts from going to anyone who will not sign a statement of opposition to BDS and renounce participation in BDS. Both groups are denying freedom of speech but the latter is openly sanctioning freedom of speech and is outrageously unconstitutional.
Which SCOTUS, and declared what unConstitutional? The current SCOTUS changes its mind every 20 minutes, except it always runs interference for Donnie.