I agree. It may be deeply embedded behavior, but we can do better. We should still try to expose and shame those who perpetuate violence in the name of colonialism. Call out the propaganda for what it is.
I agree. It may be deeply embedded behavior, but we can do better. We should still try to expose and shame those who perpetuate violence in the name of colonialism. Call out the propaganda for what it is.
Yes, calling out propaganda and pointing out patterns of violence is absolutely valid — but we may have different expectations about human nature.
I don’t believe we can "do better" in the sense of fundamentally changing who we are. We're just animals with more complex neural wiring. If you put a hungry lion next to a zebra, it will try to eat it. That’s not cruelty — that’s behavior shaped by biology and environment.
You can reduce the violence by managing the conditions. Feed the lion well, and maybe it won’t attack — but the wiring doesn’t change. The moment scarcity returns, so does the instinct.
Same with humans. If we remove scarcity and fear, we suppress some of our worst behaviors. But we don’t "grow out" of them. Pretending we will is like expecting a lion to adopt vegetarianism because it's learned better morals.
Unless we somehow solve scarcity — which we likely won’t anytime soon — this behavior remains. That's the uncomfortable but honest truth.
I agree on the nature of, well, nature. In a civilization context, scarcity is often created artificially to exact an unfair advantage. The better armed faction will create scarcity upon it's rival. Thanks for the conversation. We all need to explore these concepts and spread this self-awareness.
Scarcity is only fake. Abrahamists have been talking about the "poor and needy" for thousands of years. It's a ploy to ensure that their greed can be justified. It's pure ignorance and bullshit to think there's not enough to go around. We just have to get the idiot Jew genociders and Capitalists to share.
we're still talking humans here though, and a certain point you start making choices, you chose not to see, that is an actual choice. You're almost starting to sound like it's noone's fault. Israeli's haven't lived in scarcity for quite a while now, and they have sub humans building their illegal houses at low wages with the stones they got from demolishing the sub humans houses, so to speak, you can't tell me that's not a choice
You’re trying to read too much into what’s written. Sometimes a red door is just a red door.
I’m not excusing anything—I’m just explaining why things happen. And here’s the uncomfortable truth: what we call “choice” is an illusion. Once the wave function collapses—once uncertainty resolves—the system becomes deterministic. From that point on, everything unfolds according to the variables in place. It’s like a pure function: if you feed in the same parameters, you’ll always get the same output. There’s no freedom in that—just the appearance of it, because we can’t process all the variables in real time.
Regarding scarcity—no country on Earth is post-scarcity, including Israel. Scarcity doesn’t just mean famine. It’s about inequality, control, and access. And that’s everywhere.
About your point on using “sub-humans” to build houses—what's the difference between that and actual, still-legal slavery in Mauritania? Or the slave auctions in Congo? Or the treatment of foreign workers in Gulf states building luxury towers or FIFA stadiums?
My point is: what Israel is doing is horrific—it's genocide, it's mass killing. But from the broader lens of human history and behavior, sadly... it's just Tuesday.
Scarcity is in your stupid little head. Most human societies in world history have no problem feeding, clothing and housing ALL of their people. Nature is abundant. Jews, Christians and Capitalists love to promote the idea of scarcity to justify their greed. Think it through. If we eradicate billionaires everyone in the world could easily live like a medieval king. Greed is the issue. The Scarcity is in your head. It takes the form of brainwashed ignorance. Wake up.
You’re mistaking ideology for physics. Scarcity isn’t a mental illness or a capitalist illusion—it’s a fundamental part of reality. Let’s start with the human side: not everyone has the same cognitive capacity. That’s not oppression, that’s biology. Some people process abstract thought faster, reason more deeply, adapt more flexibly. Others don’t. That’s cognitive scarcity—a limitation in mental bandwidth, decision-making, and problem-solving that exists whether or not money is involved. A society pretending everyone’s thinking ability is equal is lying to itself.
Then there's resource scarcity. Even in the most fair and well-designed system, you’re still dealing with limited physical resources. Land, time, food, clean water, energy—all of it has hard limits. Nature isn’t an infinite buffet. You can’t feed the planet’s population with free-range steak and solar power forever without burning through ecosystems. Distribution systems help—but they don’t create more mass or energy. That’s not capitalism talking, that’s just physics.
Take oil. It’s a textbook example of geopolitical scarcity. It’s not evenly distributed, it’s expensive to extract, and its supply chains are vulnerable to war, sanctions, and sabotage. Countries don’t fight over illusions—they fight over limited, high-value resources. That’s scarcity in action. Denying it doesn’t make it go away.
And look, I’m not saying unchecked capitalism is perfect—it clearly isn’t. But not every system built on markets is broken. I lived and studied in Denmark. It’s a functional example of a socialist-capitalist hybrid with progressive taxation, strong welfare, and market-driven innovation. It works not because it denies scarcity or human inequality—but because it acknowledges both and manages them.
Honestly, it seems like you think the United States is the whole world. News flash: it’s not. The world is a lot bigger, more diverse, and more nuanced than the American binary of “greedy billionaires vs. exploited masses.” There are dozens of models—Singapore, Switzerland, Sweden, Germany, Denmark—that prove it's not about denying scarcity or hating markets, it's about designing systems that adapt to reality instead of pretending it doesn’t exist.
So if you want to talk about greed, inequality, or better systems—let’s talk. But pretending scarcity is just “in your head”? That’s not a revolution, that’s just magical thinking.
Everyone has different intelligences and skills. Your standards here are arbitrary. Process abstract thought too slowly so you're scarce of intelligence? This is really stupid anti-logic, Marv. Your lacking brain cells doesn't mean that the planet can't feed everyone. Nature is abundant when respected. The problem is that Jews hate the natural world, and can't recognize their own mother in this regard.
Deeply embedded in Abrahamism, not really accurate for most of the world most of the time. Judeo-Christians are history's greatest genociders by tens of millions more dead than their next competitors. Learn the truth about history. Nobody has to behave like a Jew.
If we're talking strictly about religion and its role in atrocities, then let’s be honest—all major religions have been tied to violence at some point. Whether through conquest, forced conversions, inquisitions, or sectarian warfare, none of them are clean. So trying to single out one tradition as the worst is just selective outrage.
If you really want to look at it from a scale perspective, the logical approach would be to examine the dominant belief systems in the most populated regions. That leads us straight to Buddhism and Taoism/Confucianism across East and Southeast Asia. While those are often marketed as peaceful philosophies, they were deeply embedded in state control, hierarchy, and obedience. For centuries, these systems served as moral frameworks for authoritarian rule, long before communism took root.
Which brings us to the modern death toll. The worst atrocities of the 20th century came from Communist regimes, which were officially secular but still heavily influenced by the cultural DNA of their regions. Mao Zedong was responsible for 40 to 65 million deaths through policies like the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution. Stalin followed with about 20 million through purges, famines, and gulags. Lenin added another 5 to 6 million between executions, civil war, and manufactured famine. The Khmer Rouge in Cambodia killed 1.5 to 2 million in just a few years. And North Korea’s ongoing disasters have likely caused over a million deaths due to famine alone.
And just as a little binmot—so excuse the lack of surgical precision—the person who arguably bears responsibility for the most deaths in history might be Karl Marx. Not because he ever pulled a trigger, but because his ideas laid the ideological foundation for regimes that killed over 100 million people in under a century.
So if you want to talk about religion and atrocities, I’m more than willing to break it down piece by piece. But let’s keep it factual, consistent, and above all—logical. Otherwise, you’re not analyzing history—you’re just venting your bias.
BUT, let's not forget that Judeo-Christian Capitalism has killed tens of millions more innocents than any other ideology in world history. That's why Abrahamic Capitalists are the piggies people on the planet, obs.
I agree. It may be deeply embedded behavior, but we can do better. We should still try to expose and shame those who perpetuate violence in the name of colonialism. Call out the propaganda for what it is.
Yes, calling out propaganda and pointing out patterns of violence is absolutely valid — but we may have different expectations about human nature.
I don’t believe we can "do better" in the sense of fundamentally changing who we are. We're just animals with more complex neural wiring. If you put a hungry lion next to a zebra, it will try to eat it. That’s not cruelty — that’s behavior shaped by biology and environment.
You can reduce the violence by managing the conditions. Feed the lion well, and maybe it won’t attack — but the wiring doesn’t change. The moment scarcity returns, so does the instinct.
Same with humans. If we remove scarcity and fear, we suppress some of our worst behaviors. But we don’t "grow out" of them. Pretending we will is like expecting a lion to adopt vegetarianism because it's learned better morals.
Unless we somehow solve scarcity — which we likely won’t anytime soon — this behavior remains. That's the uncomfortable but honest truth.
I agree on the nature of, well, nature. In a civilization context, scarcity is often created artificially to exact an unfair advantage. The better armed faction will create scarcity upon it's rival. Thanks for the conversation. We all need to explore these concepts and spread this self-awareness.
Scarcity is only fake. Abrahamists have been talking about the "poor and needy" for thousands of years. It's a ploy to ensure that their greed can be justified. It's pure ignorance and bullshit to think there's not enough to go around. We just have to get the idiot Jew genociders and Capitalists to share.
we're still talking humans here though, and a certain point you start making choices, you chose not to see, that is an actual choice. You're almost starting to sound like it's noone's fault. Israeli's haven't lived in scarcity for quite a while now, and they have sub humans building their illegal houses at low wages with the stones they got from demolishing the sub humans houses, so to speak, you can't tell me that's not a choice
You’re trying to read too much into what’s written. Sometimes a red door is just a red door.
I’m not excusing anything—I’m just explaining why things happen. And here’s the uncomfortable truth: what we call “choice” is an illusion. Once the wave function collapses—once uncertainty resolves—the system becomes deterministic. From that point on, everything unfolds according to the variables in place. It’s like a pure function: if you feed in the same parameters, you’ll always get the same output. There’s no freedom in that—just the appearance of it, because we can’t process all the variables in real time.
Regarding scarcity—no country on Earth is post-scarcity, including Israel. Scarcity doesn’t just mean famine. It’s about inequality, control, and access. And that’s everywhere.
About your point on using “sub-humans” to build houses—what's the difference between that and actual, still-legal slavery in Mauritania? Or the slave auctions in Congo? Or the treatment of foreign workers in Gulf states building luxury towers or FIFA stadiums?
My point is: what Israel is doing is horrific—it's genocide, it's mass killing. But from the broader lens of human history and behavior, sadly... it's just Tuesday.
All of the earth is abundant. Scarcity is a purely human fabrication. Wake up!
Scarcity is in your stupid little head. Most human societies in world history have no problem feeding, clothing and housing ALL of their people. Nature is abundant. Jews, Christians and Capitalists love to promote the idea of scarcity to justify their greed. Think it through. If we eradicate billionaires everyone in the world could easily live like a medieval king. Greed is the issue. The Scarcity is in your head. It takes the form of brainwashed ignorance. Wake up.
You’re mistaking ideology for physics. Scarcity isn’t a mental illness or a capitalist illusion—it’s a fundamental part of reality. Let’s start with the human side: not everyone has the same cognitive capacity. That’s not oppression, that’s biology. Some people process abstract thought faster, reason more deeply, adapt more flexibly. Others don’t. That’s cognitive scarcity—a limitation in mental bandwidth, decision-making, and problem-solving that exists whether or not money is involved. A society pretending everyone’s thinking ability is equal is lying to itself.
Then there's resource scarcity. Even in the most fair and well-designed system, you’re still dealing with limited physical resources. Land, time, food, clean water, energy—all of it has hard limits. Nature isn’t an infinite buffet. You can’t feed the planet’s population with free-range steak and solar power forever without burning through ecosystems. Distribution systems help—but they don’t create more mass or energy. That’s not capitalism talking, that’s just physics.
Take oil. It’s a textbook example of geopolitical scarcity. It’s not evenly distributed, it’s expensive to extract, and its supply chains are vulnerable to war, sanctions, and sabotage. Countries don’t fight over illusions—they fight over limited, high-value resources. That’s scarcity in action. Denying it doesn’t make it go away.
And look, I’m not saying unchecked capitalism is perfect—it clearly isn’t. But not every system built on markets is broken. I lived and studied in Denmark. It’s a functional example of a socialist-capitalist hybrid with progressive taxation, strong welfare, and market-driven innovation. It works not because it denies scarcity or human inequality—but because it acknowledges both and manages them.
Honestly, it seems like you think the United States is the whole world. News flash: it’s not. The world is a lot bigger, more diverse, and more nuanced than the American binary of “greedy billionaires vs. exploited masses.” There are dozens of models—Singapore, Switzerland, Sweden, Germany, Denmark—that prove it's not about denying scarcity or hating markets, it's about designing systems that adapt to reality instead of pretending it doesn’t exist.
So if you want to talk about greed, inequality, or better systems—let’s talk. But pretending scarcity is just “in your head”? That’s not a revolution, that’s just magical thinking.
Everyone has different intelligences and skills. Your standards here are arbitrary. Process abstract thought too slowly so you're scarce of intelligence? This is really stupid anti-logic, Marv. Your lacking brain cells doesn't mean that the planet can't feed everyone. Nature is abundant when respected. The problem is that Jews hate the natural world, and can't recognize their own mother in this regard.
Deeply embedded in Abrahamism, not really accurate for most of the world most of the time. Judeo-Christians are history's greatest genociders by tens of millions more dead than their next competitors. Learn the truth about history. Nobody has to behave like a Jew.
If we're talking strictly about religion and its role in atrocities, then let’s be honest—all major religions have been tied to violence at some point. Whether through conquest, forced conversions, inquisitions, or sectarian warfare, none of them are clean. So trying to single out one tradition as the worst is just selective outrage.
If you really want to look at it from a scale perspective, the logical approach would be to examine the dominant belief systems in the most populated regions. That leads us straight to Buddhism and Taoism/Confucianism across East and Southeast Asia. While those are often marketed as peaceful philosophies, they were deeply embedded in state control, hierarchy, and obedience. For centuries, these systems served as moral frameworks for authoritarian rule, long before communism took root.
Which brings us to the modern death toll. The worst atrocities of the 20th century came from Communist regimes, which were officially secular but still heavily influenced by the cultural DNA of their regions. Mao Zedong was responsible for 40 to 65 million deaths through policies like the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution. Stalin followed with about 20 million through purges, famines, and gulags. Lenin added another 5 to 6 million between executions, civil war, and manufactured famine. The Khmer Rouge in Cambodia killed 1.5 to 2 million in just a few years. And North Korea’s ongoing disasters have likely caused over a million deaths due to famine alone.
And just as a little binmot—so excuse the lack of surgical precision—the person who arguably bears responsibility for the most deaths in history might be Karl Marx. Not because he ever pulled a trigger, but because his ideas laid the ideological foundation for regimes that killed over 100 million people in under a century.
So if you want to talk about religion and atrocities, I’m more than willing to break it down piece by piece. But let’s keep it factual, consistent, and above all—logical. Otherwise, you’re not analyzing history—you’re just venting your bias.
BUT, let's not forget that Judeo-Christian Capitalism has killed tens of millions more innocents than any other ideology in world history. That's why Abrahamic Capitalists are the piggies people on the planet, obs.
All religions Marvin? .That's an extreme exaggeration. More inaccurate information from not so marvelous Marv.