Interesting take, but let’s break this down calmly.
If you're claiming that for the majority of 280,000 years humans lived in peaceful, egalitarian democracies, you’ll need to provide solid anthropological evidence. From what we know through archaeology and recorded history—from ancient Mesopotamia, Egypt, Rome, Greece, to dynastic China …
Interesting take, but let’s break this down calmly.
If you're claiming that for the majority of 280,000 years humans lived in peaceful, egalitarian democracies, you’ll need to provide solid anthropological evidence. From what we know through archaeology and recorded history—from ancient Mesopotamia, Egypt, Rome, Greece, to dynastic China and Mesoamerican empires—conflict, conquest, and inequality were recurring themes. Scarcity, tribalism, and competition were central to survival.
You accuse me of pushing "genocide logic," but I’m not defending any ideology—I’m pointing out historical patterns. History doesn’t care about your feelings or religion; it’s a record of power, survival, and systems evolving over time. If you claim that pre-agricultural or early human societies were different, fine—then cite your sources and hypotheses clearly.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I'm open to a deeper zoom-out if you're offering data, not just outrage.
Interesting take, but let’s break this down calmly.
If you're claiming that for the majority of 280,000 years humans lived in peaceful, egalitarian democracies, you’ll need to provide solid anthropological evidence. From what we know through archaeology and recorded history—from ancient Mesopotamia, Egypt, Rome, Greece, to dynastic China and Mesoamerican empires—conflict, conquest, and inequality were recurring themes. Scarcity, tribalism, and competition were central to survival.
You accuse me of pushing "genocide logic," but I’m not defending any ideology—I’m pointing out historical patterns. History doesn’t care about your feelings or religion; it’s a record of power, survival, and systems evolving over time. If you claim that pre-agricultural or early human societies were different, fine—then cite your sources and hypotheses clearly.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I'm open to a deeper zoom-out if you're offering data, not just outrage.